Project Profile Builder
Captures your research details and builds a stored “Project Profile” so you can use the same context across all other tools.
Each tool aligns with a chapter of the book. Click through to open the tool that matches where you are in your doctoral journey.
Captures your research details and builds a stored “Project Profile” so you can use the same context across all other tools.
Uses stepwise, Socratic dialogue to take you from initial idea to a coherent, examinable research proposal.
Audits risk, scope and practicality, helping you calibrate ambition and feasibility before you commit.
Evaluates your research questions, checks for the “Seven Deadly Sins” and refines them through structured dialogue.
Analyses the coherence, robustness, ethics and theory–method fit of your research design.
Tests the coherence of your stance on reality and knowledge, and its alignment with your methods and questions.
Helps you choose and use AI platforms for literature searching and sense-making in your area.
Diagnoses structural and criticality weaknesses in your literature chapter and suggests targeted improvements.
Supports you in selecting, adapting and critiquing theory so that it genuinely works for your project.
Unpacks key concepts, clarifying their assumptions, variants and implications for your design and analysis.
Helps you trace and assess how theory is mobilised in the literature you are reviewing.
Tests your significance claims against your design and data, and helps you locate them on a realistic spectrum.
Detects misalignments among questions, theory, methods and claims, helping you repair the “golden thread”.
Maps conceptual and structural linkages across chapters so that the thesis reads as a single, coherent argument.
Reviews your introduction for coverage, balance, framing and academic register, suggesting concrete revisions.
Assesses how well you frame your context, balance description with analysis and connect to theory.
Evaluates methodological detail, ethics, sampling and analytical strategy for clarity and defensibility.
Identifies missing synthesis, weak originality claims or underdeveloped implications for theory and practice.
Helps you craft an abstract that is balanced, precise and internally consistent with the rest of the thesis.
Generates and refines three alternative titles, sharpening precision, distinctiveness and examiner-friendliness.
Simulates examiner questioning through selectable personas so you can rehearse robust, confident answers.
